Optimal timing of delivery for growth restricted fetuses with gastroschisis: A decision analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the optimal timing of delivery of growth restricted fetuses with gastroschisis in the setting of normal umbilical artery (UA) Dopplers. METHODS: We designed a decision analytic model using TreeAge software for a hypothetical cohort of 2000 fetuses with isolated gastroschisis, fetal growth restriction (FGR), and normal UA Dopplers across 34-39 weeks of gestation. This model accounted for costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for the pregnant individual and the neonate. Model outcomes included stillbirth, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), short gut syndrome (SGS), neonatal sepsis, neonatal death, and neurodevelopmental disability (NDD). RESULTS: We found 38 weeks to be the optimal timing of delivery for minimizing overall perinatal mortality and leading to the highest total QALYs. Compared to 37 weeks, delivery at 38 weeks resulted in 367.98 more QALYs, 2.22 more cases of stillbirth, 2.41 fewer cases of RDS, 0.02 fewer cases of NEC, 1.65 fewer cases of IVH, 0.5 fewer cases of SGS, 2.04 fewer cases of sepsis, 11.8 fewer neonatal deaths and 3.37 fewer cases of NDD. However, 39 weeks were the most cost-effective strategy with a savings of $1,053,471 compared to 38 weeks. Monte Carlo analysis demonstrated that 38 weeks was the optimal gestational age for delivery 51.70% of the time, 39 weeks were optimal 47.40% of the time, and 37 weeks was optimal 0.90% of the time. CONCLUSION: Taking into consideration a range of adverse perinatal outcomes and cost effectiveness, 38-39 weeks gestation is ideal for the delivery of fetuses with gastroschisis, FGR, and normal UA Dopplers. However, there are unique details to consider for each case, and the timing of delivery should be individualized using shared multidisciplinary decision making.

Differences in Perinatal Outcomes among Rural Women by County Composition.

OBJECTIVE: We compared differences in perinatal outcomes among rural and nonrural women, stratified by maternal race/ethnicity. We also examined differences between majority minority rural counties with majority White rural counties. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with 2015 national vital statistics birth certificate data. Maternal county of residence was identified, and counties with <50,000 people were designated as rural. We compared adverse perinatal outcomes between rural and nonrural residents, stratified by race/ethnicity. Adverse perinatal outcomes included primary term cesarean, preterm birth (PTB) <37 and <32 weeks, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, infant death, small for gestational age, and Apgar's scores <7 and <3 at 5minutes. Majority-minority rural counties were defined as counties having <50% White women. We compared perinatal outcomes among this cohort to those of women from majority White rural counties. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: Within the entire cohort, rural residents were more likely to be younger (age ≥35 years, 10.1 vs. 16.8%; p<0.001), Medicaid beneficiaries (50.3 vs. 44.1%; p<0.001), and uninsured (6.6 vs. 4.2%; p<0.001), and less likely to be married (57.4 vs. 60.20%; p<0.001). Rural residence was associated with Apgar's score <7 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64-2.54) and <3 (aOR=1.90; 95% CI: 1.04-3.48) among Asian women. Rural residence was also associated with PTB <37 weeks among Black (aOR=1.09; 95% CI: 1.06-1.13) and Asian women (aOR=1.16; 95% CI: 1.03-1.31). When compared with majority White rural county of residence, majority-minority rural county of residence was associated with the adverse perinatal outcomes studied. CONCLUSION: We observed increased rates of adverse perinatal outcomes among rural women. These trends persisted in majority-minority rural. Additional study is needed to find actionable targets for improving outcomes for rural women. KEY POINTS: · Rural county of residence was associated with lower socioeconomic markers.. · Perinatal outcomes were worse among women from rural counties.. · Differences in perinatal outcomes exist among rural women by race/ethnicity..

Obstetric management for stillbirth complicated by a prior cesarean delivery: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: The primary concern for a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) is a uterine rupture leading to neonatal injury or mortality and maternal mortality. In individuals who have a term stillbirth, the neonatal concern is absent, yet repeat cesarean delivery remains common in this setting. Given the increased maternal risks from cesarean, it is important to evaluate obstetric management options in the population of women who have a term stillbirth and prior cesarean delivery (CD). OBJECTIVES: To examine the outcomes and costs of a TOLAC via induction of labor verses a repeat CD for cases of stillbirth occurring near term. STUDY DESIGN: A decision-analytic model incorporating the current and a subsequent delivery using TreeAge software was designed to compare outcomes in women induced for a TOLAC to those undergoing repeat CD in the setting of stillbirth at 34-41 weeks' gestation. We used a theoretical cohort of 6000 women, the estimated annual number of women a prior cesarean who experience a stillbirth in the United States. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALY) for both modes of delivery with consideration of future pregnancy risks. Future pregnancy risks included uterine rupture, hysterectomy, placenta accreta, maternal death, neonatal death, and neonatal neurological deficits. Probabilities were derived from the literature, and a cost-effectiveness threshold was set at $100,000/QALY. RESULTS: In our theoretical cohort of 6000 women with a prior CD and current stillbirth, induction of labor resulted in 4836 fewer cesarean deliveries during stillbirth management, 1040 fewer cesarean deliveries in the subsequent pregnancy, and 14 fewer cases of placenta accreta in the subsequent pregnancy, despite 29 additional uterine ruptures across both pregnancies. Induction of labor was found to be the dominant strategy, resulting in decreased costs and increased QALYs. Univariate sensitivity analyses demonstrated that induction of labor was cost effective until the risk of uterine rupture in the first delivery exceeded 0.83% (baseline estimate: 0.38%). Additional univariate sensitivity analyses found that induction of labor was cost effective until the risk of IOL failure in the first delivery exceeded 64% (baseline estimate: 19%). CONCLUSION: In our theoretical cohort, induction of labor for TOLAC in the setting of a stillbirth with a history of prior CD is cost effective compared to a repeat CD. The results of this analysis demonstrate the benefit of induction of labor among women in this scenario who desire a future pregnancy.

Severe maternal morbidity and Black-white differences in Washington State.

OBJECTIVE: Rates of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) are significantly higher among Black women and some data suggests further worsening of these rates among hospitals with the highest proportion of Black deliveries. In this study, we sought to examine whether Black women have higher SMM in Washington State and whether this varied by hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked birth-hospital discharge data from Washington State. We compared Non-Hispanic Black women with Non-Hispanic white women and excluded observations with missing hospital information. SMM was defined using an already published algorithm. We ranked hospitals into low-, medium- and high Black-serving hospitals by using proportions of deliveries to Black women among all deliveries. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association of Black women with SMM adjusted for demographics, co-morbidities and clustering within hospital. RESULTS: In the cohort of 407,808 women, 4556 (1.12%) had SMM. High Black-serving hospitals had the highest rate of SMM (1.94%) as compared to medium Black-serving hospitals (1.16%) and low Black-serving hospitals (1.06%) (p < .01). Odds of SMM was higher in Black women (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.39-1.78) and remained elevated after adjusting for demographics and the level of Black-serving hospital (aOR= 1.29, 95% CI: 1.11-1.49). CONCLUSION: We found that the risk of SMM was higher among Black women. Hospital level performance and health outcomes stratified by maternal race and ethnicity in hospitals and hospital systems should be addressed to further reduce disparities and optimize outcomes.

Is Appropriate Administration of Antenatal Corticosteroids Associated with Maternal Race?

OBJECTIVE: Antenatal corticosteroids (ACSs) improve outcomes for premature infants; however, not all pregnant women at risk for preterm delivery receive ACS. Racial minorities are less likely to receive adequate prenatal care and more likely to deliver preterm. The objective of this study was to determine if maternal race is associated with a lower rate of ACS administration in Washington for women at risk of preterm labor (between 23 and 34 weeks). STUDY DESIGN: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study of singleton, nonanomalous, premature deliveries in Washington state between 2007 and 2014. Descriptive data included maternal sociodemographics, pregnancy complications, facility of birth, and neonatal characteristics. The primary outcome was maternal receipt of ACS and the independent variable was maternal race/ethnicity. The secondary outcomes included neonatal need for assisted ventilation, both initially and for more than 6 hours, and administration of surfactant. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 8,530 nonanomalous, singleton neonates were born between 23 and 34 weeks' gestation. Of those, 55.8% of mothers were self-identified as white, 7.5% as black, 21.4% as Hispanic, 10.9% as Asian, and 4.3% as Native American. After adjusting for confounders, black woman-neonate dyads had significantly lower odds of receiving ACS, (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.76), assisted ventilation immediately following delivery (aOR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.61-0.94) and for more than 6 hours (aOR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.49-0.84) and surfactant therapy (aOR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.92) as compared with whites. CONCLUSION: These findings contribute to the current body of literature by describing racial disparities in ACS administration for pregnant women at risk for preterm delivery. To better understand the association between black race and administration of ACS, future studies should focus on differences within and between hospitals (including quality, location, resources), patient health literacy, social determinants of health, and exposure to systemic racism and discrimination. KEY POINTS: · Black women were less likely to receive antenatal steroids.. · Black neonates had lower odds of respiratory support.. · Black neonates had lower odds of receiving surfactant..

The Risk of Perinatal Mortality in Nulliparous Women Compared to Primiparous Women at Term.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the rate of perinatal mortality among nulliparous women compared with primiparous women at term and further characterize the risk of stillbirth by each week of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of all term, singleton, nonanomalous births comparing perinatal mortality (stillbirth and neonatal death [NND]) between primiparous (parity = 1, with no history of abortion) and nulliparous (parity = 0) women who delivered in California between 2007 and 2011. Chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the frequencies and strength of association of perinatal mortality with parity, adjusting for maternal age, race, body mass index, pregestational diabetes, chronic hypertension, fetal sex, smoking status, and socioeconomic status. The risk of stillbirth at each gestational age at term was calculated using a pregnancies-at-risk life table method. A p-value less than 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: Of 1,317,761 total deliveries, 765,995 (58.1%) were to nulliparous women and 551,766 (41.9%) were to primiparous women with one prior birth. Nulliparous women had increased odds of stillbirth (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.93-3.72) and NND (aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.19-1.98) compared with primiparous women. The risk of stillbirth in nulliparous women was greater at every gestational age between 370/7 and 410/7 weeks compared with primiparous women. Nulliparous women also had increased odds of small for gestational age infants at less than 10% birth weight (aOR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.72-1.79), less than 5% birth weight (aOR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.86-1.98), and less than 3% birth weight (aOR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.93-2.11). CONCLUSION: Perinatal mortality is significantly greater in nulliparous women compared with primiparous women with term deliveries. These findings suggest that low-risk nulliparous women may require increased surveillance. There may be a role in improving maternal health by maximizing physiologic adaptation in nulliparous women. KEY POINTS: · Parity is associated with perinatal mortality.. · Perinatal mortality is significantly greater in nulliparous women compared with primiparous women.. · The risk of stillbirth in nulliparous women is greater at every gestational age compared with primiparous women..

Long and short interpregnancy intervals increase severe maternal morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Severe maternal morbidity is a composite variable that includes adverse maternal outcomes during pregnancy that are associated with maternal mortality. Previous literature has shown that interpregnancy interval is associated with preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, and low birthweight, but the association of interpregnancy interval and composite severe maternal morbidity is not well studied. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the relationship between interpregnancy interval (stratified as <6, 6-11, 12-17, 18-23, 24-59, and ≥60 months) and severe maternal morbidity, which we considered both with and without blood transfusion. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of multiparous women 15 to 54 years old with singleton, nonanomalous births between 23 and 42 weeks gestation in California (2007-2012). We defined severe maternal morbidity as the composite score of a published list of the International Classification of Diseases, ninth Revision, diagnoses and procedure codes, provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We used chi-square tests for categorical variables, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association of interpregnancy interval (independent variable) with severe maternal morbidity (dependent variable), adjusted for maternal race and ethnicity, age, education, body mass index, insurance, prenatal care, smoking status, and maternal comorbidity index score. RESULTS: Here, 1,669,912 women met the inclusion criteria, and of these women, 14,529 (0.87%) had severe maternal morbidity and 4712 (0.28%) had nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity. Multivariable logistic regression models showed that compared with women with 18 to 23 months interpregnancy interval, women with an interpregnancy interval of <6 months (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.34) and ≥60 months (adjusted odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.19) had significantly higher adjusted odds of severe maternal morbidity. The odds of nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity is higher in women with long interpregnancy intervals (≥60 months) after controlling for the same potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio, 1.17, 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.31). In addition, we found significantly higher odds of requiring ventilation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.75) and maternal sepsis (adjusted odds ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.31) in women with long interpregnancy interval. CONCLUSION: The risk of severe maternal morbidity was higher in women with short interpregnancy interval (<6 months) and long interpregnancy interval (≥60 months) compared with women with normal interpregnancy interval (18-23 months). The risk of nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity was significantly higher in women with long interpregnancy interval (≥60 months). Interpregnancy interval is a modifiable risk factor, and counseling women to have an adequate gap between pregnancies may be an important strategy to decrease the risk of severe maternal morbidity.

Timing of delivery in women with prior uterine rupture: a decision analysis.

Background: Uterine rupture is an obstetric complication with high rates of associated maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. However, limited guidance for the timing of delivery in women with a history of prior uterine rupture exists.Objective: To determine the optimal gestational age of delivery in women with prior uterine rupture.Study design: A decision-analytic model was built using TreeAge software to compare the outcomes of repeat cesarean delivery when performed at 32, 33, 34, 35, or 36 weeks gestation in a theoretical cohort of 1000 women with prior uterine rupture. Strategies involved expectant management until a later gestational age accounting for the risks of spontaneous uterine rupture, spontaneous labor, uterine rupture following spontaneous labor, and stillbirth during each successive week that a woman was still pregnant. Maternal outcomes included uterine rupture, hysterectomy, and death. Neonatal outcomes included hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, cerebral palsy, and death. Probabilities were derived from the literature and total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were used to vary model inputs to investigate the robustness of our baseline assumptions.Results: In our theoretical cohort of 1000 pregnant women with a history of prior uterine rupture, cesarean delivery at 34 weeks maximized maternal and neonatal QALYs. Compared to delivery at 36 weeks, delivery at 34 weeks would prevent 38.6 uterine ruptures, 0.079 maternal deaths, 6.10 hysterectomies, and 12.1 neonatal deaths but results in 4.70 more cases of cerebral palsy. Univariate sensitivity analysis found that repeat cesarean at 34 weeks remained the optimal strategy until the probability of spontaneous repeat uterine rupture (baseline estimate: 0.68%) fell below 0.2% or rose above 0.9%, at which point, a strategy of delivery at 35 or 32 weeks became optimal, respectively. However, Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated that delivery at 35 weeks was the optimal strategy 37% of the time, whereas 34 weeks was the optimal strategy 17% of the time.Conclusion: The optimal time for repeat cesarean delivery in women with prior uterine rupture appears to be between 34-0/7 and 35-6/7 weeks gestation.

Increased rates of adverse perinatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes and depression.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the impact of depression on adverse perinatal outcomes in women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing the rates of perinatal complications among singleton, nonanomalous births to women with GDM and the diagnosis of depression compared to GDM women without depression between 2007 and 2011 in California. Perinatal outcomes were analyzed using chi-square and multivariable logistic regression to compare frequencies of characteristics and outcomes and to determine the strength of association of depression and adverse perinatal outcomes among women with GDM. Statistical comparisons with a p-value of less than .05 and 95% CI that did not cross the null were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Among the cohort of 170,572 women with GDM, 2090 (1.22%) were diagnosed with antenatal depression. Women with GDM and depression had significantly higher rates of preeclampsia (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 1.28, 95% CI 1.11-1.49) and gestational hypertension (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05-1.44). Women with GDM and depression also had higher rates of preterm delivery at <37, and <34 weeks gestational age (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.50 and 1.36, 95% CI 1.15-1.61, respectively). CONCLUSION: Women with GDM and a diagnosis of depression have higher rates of adverse perinatal outcomes than women with GDM alone. Identifying and managing depression among women with GDM has the potential to improve the care and health of this high-risk population.

Association of Widespread Adoption of the 39-Week Rule With Overall Mortality Due to Stillbirth and Infant Death.

Importance: To improve neonatal morbidity, efforts have been made to reduce elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks' gestation, also known as the 39-week rule. Prolonging pregnancies also prolongs exposure to the risk of stillbirth. The true association of a 39-week rule with mortality is unknown and studies to date have shown conflicting results. Objective: To determine if widespread adoption of a 39-week rule, limiting elective deliveries prior to 39 weeks' gestation, is associated with an increase or decrease in overall mortality when considering both stillbirths and infant deaths. Design, Setting, and Participants: This historical cohort study used birth certificate and infant death certificate data in the United States to compare years before and after the adoption of the 39-week rule. Births between 2008 and 2009 were considered to be in the preadoption period (n = 7 322 234), and those between 2011 and 2012 were considered to be in the postadoption period (n = 6 972 626). Included births were singleton, nonanomalous births between 37 0/7 weeks' and 42 6/7 weeks' gestation. Statistical analysis was performed from July 19, 2016, through June 27, 2019. Exposures: The exposure of interest was the Joint Commission adoption of the 39-week rule as a quality measure. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes of interest were stillbirth and infant death. Results: A total of 7 322 234 births (49.0% girls and 51.0% boys) were included in the preadoption period and 6 972 626 births (49.1% girls and 50.9% boys) were included in the postadoption period. Compared with the preadoption period, there was a decrease in the proportion of deliveries at 37 weeks (-0.06%) and 38 weeks (-2.5%) and an increase in the proportion of deliveries at 39 weeks (6.8%) and 40 weeks (0.2%) in the postadoption period (P < .001). The stillbirth rate increased in the postadoption cohort compared with preadoption (0.09% vs 0.10%; P < .001). The infant death rate decreased in the postadoption period compared with preadoption (0.21% vs 0.20%; P < .001). An overall mortality rate of 0.31% was calculated for the preadoption period and 0.30% for the postadoption period (P = .06). Additional analysis in a counterfactual model suggests that up to 34.2% of the difference in mortality could be associated with the 39-week rule. Conclusions and Relevance: Stable overall perinatal mortality rates were observed in the 2-year period immediately after adoption of the 39-week rule, despite an increase in stillbirth.

Fetal hydrops and the risk of severe preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence and severity of preeclampsia in pregnancies complicated by fetal hydrops. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of singleton gestations from 2005 to 2008 in California. The primary predictor was fetal hydrops and the primary outcome was preeclampsia. Selected adverse maternal and neonatal events were assessed as secondary outcomes. Potential confounders examined included fetal anomalies, polyhydramnios, race/ethnicity, nulliparity, chronic hypertension, and gestational or pregestational diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: We identified 337 pregnancies complicated by fetal hydrops, 70.0% had a concomitant fetal anomaly and 39.8% had polyhydramnios. Compared to the general population, hydrops was associated with an increased risk for severe preeclampsia (5.26 versus 0.91%, p < .001) but not mild preeclampsia (2.86 versus 2.02%, p = .29). In multivariable analysis, fetal hydrops remained an independent risk factor for severe preeclampsia (as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) 3.13, 1.91-5.14). Hydrops was also associated with increased rates of eclampsia, acute renal failure, pulmonary edema, postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion, preterm birth, and neonatal death. CONCLUSIONS: We find that fetal hydrops is an independent risk factor for severe preeclampsia. In light of serious concerns for maternal and neonatal health, heightened surveillance for signs and symptoms of severe preeclampsia is warranted in all pregnancies complicated by fetal hydrops.

The growth-restricted fetus: risk of mortality by each additional week of expectant management.

OBJECTIVE: To compare fetal/infant mortality risk associated with each additional week of expectant management with the infant mortality risk of immediate delivery in growth-restricted pregnancies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies from the 2005-2008 California Birth Registry comparing pregnancies affected and unaffected by growth restriction, defined using birth weights as a proxy for fetal growth restriction (FGR). Birth weights were subdivided as greater than the 90th percentile, between the 10th percentile and 90th percentile, and less than the 10th percentile. Cases greater than the 90th percentile were excluded from analysis. Cases less than the 10th percentile were considered to have FGR and were further subcategorized into <10th percentile, <5th percentile, and <3rd percentile. We compared the risk of infant death at each gestational age week against a composite risk representing the mortality risk of one additional week of expectant management. RESULTS: We identified 1,641,000 births, of which 110,748 (6.7%) were less than 10th percentile. The risk of stillbirth increased with gestational age with the risk of stillbirth at each week of gestation inversely proportional to growth percentile. The risks of fetal and infant mortality with expectant management outweighed the risk of infant death for all FGR categories analyzed beginning at 38 weeks. However, the absolute risks differed by growth percentiles, with the highest risks of infant death and stillbirth in the <3rd percentile cohort. At 39 weeks, absolute risks were low, although the number needed to deliver to prevent 1 death ranged from 413 for <3rd percentile to 2667 in unaffected pregnancies. CONCLUSION: At 38 weeks, the mortality risk of expectant management for one additional week exceeds the risk of delivery across all growth-restricted cohorts, despite variation in absolute risk by degree of growth restriction.

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes associated with prenatal diagnosis of fetal absent cavum septi pellucidi.

BACKGROUND: Absence of the cavum septi pellucidi (CSP) on prenatal imaging is historically associated with additional anomalies; however, recent cases of isolated absent CSP have also been identified. This study seeks to assess the accuracy of prenatal imaging in evaluating isolated absent CSP and to describe the spectrum of clinical outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of all prenatally diagnosed absent CSP cases between 2011 and 2016 at our institution. Cases with additional structural parenchymal abnormalities were excluded. Clinical outcomes were abstracted from available records. RESULTS: We identified 15 cases of prenatally diagnosed isolated absent CSP. All patients were initially diagnosed on ultrasound (US) and 11/15 patients had fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirming the diagnosis. Prenatal US and MRI were concordant in all cases. Of the continuing pregnancies, 2 neonatal deaths occurred related to extreme prematurity. Two cases of septo-optic dysplasia were identified in our cohort. DISCUSSION: In this study, fetal MRI and US had a high degree of accuracy with concordant postnatal imaging. Our study is similar to other case series suggesting that a range of clinical outcomes is possible with isolated absent CSP, but long-term patient follow up is necessary.

Fetal Malpresentation and Malposition: Diagnosis and Management.

Fetal malpresentation and fetal malposition are frequently interchanged; however, fetal malpresentation refers to a fetus with a fetal part other than the head engaging the maternal pelvis. Fetal malposition in labor includes occiput posterior and occiput transverse positions. Both fetal malposition and malpresentation are associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity, which have significant impact on patients and providers. Accurate diagnosis of both conditions is necessary for appropriate management. In this review, terminology, incidence, diagnosis, and management are discussed.

Maternal and feto-placental phenotypes of early-onset severe preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize maternal and feto-placental phenotypes of severe preeclampsia that trigger early-onset delivery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort review of pregnant women receiving care from 2000 to 2010. Subjects with early-onset severe preeclampsia delivering between 20 and 32 weeks were identified excluding multiple gestations or major anomalies. We defined indications for delivery as maternal (i.e. severe headache or abnormal laboratory parameters), feto-placental (i.e. non-reassuring tracing) or mixed (i.e. both maternal and feto-placental factors). To characterize the groups, demographic, clinical, laboratory, ultrasound and pathology data were abstracted. Statistical analysis was conducted. RESULTS: We identified 164 subjects meeting inclusion criteria. Indications for delivery were maternal (57.3%), feto-placental (29.9%) or mixed (12.8%). Compared to neonates delivered for maternal indications, birthweight was significantly lower among neonates delivered for feto-placental or mixed indications (p < 0.001). While placental findings were largely similar between groups, abnormal cord insertion was more common in subjects delivered for feto-placental factors (p = 0.02). Women delivered for maternal indications had more significant lab abnormalities than women delivered for feto-placental or mixed indications. CONCLUSION: In attempting to classify early-onset severe preeclampsia by delivery indication, we found patterns to suggest that feto-placental and maternal phenotypes of disease may have distinct pathophysiologic underpinnings.

When is the optimal time to deliver late preterm IUGR fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Dopplers?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal timing of delivery in late preterm intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler (UAD) indices. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was built to determine the optimal gestational age (GA) of delivery in a theoretic cohort of 10 000 IUGR fetuses with elevated UAD systolic/diastolic ratios diagnosed at 34 weeks. All inputs were derived from the literature. Strategies involving expectant management accounted for the probabilities of stillbirth, spontaneous delivery and induction of labor for UAD absent or reversed end-diastolic flow (AREDF) at each successive week. Outcomes included short- and long-term neonatal morbidity and mortality with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) generated based on these outcomes. Base case, sensitivity analyses and a Monte Carlo simulation were performed. RESULTS: The optimal GA for delivery is 35 weeks, which minimized perinatal deaths and maximized total QALYs. Earlier delivery became optimal once the risk of stillbirth was threefold our baseline assumption; our model was also robust until the risk of AREDF at 35 weeks was half our baseline assumption, after which delivery at 36 weeks was preferred. Delivery at 35 weeks was the optimal strategy in 77% of trials in Monte Carlo multivariable sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Weighing the risks of iatrogenic prematurity against the poor outcomes associated with AREDF, the ideal GA to deliver late preterm IUGR fetuses with elevated UAD indices is 35 weeks.

The risk of fetal death in nonanomalous pregnancies affected by polyhydramnios.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the ongoing risk of intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) in nonanomalous pregnancies affected by polyhydramnios. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of all singleton, nonanomalous births in California between 2005 and 2008 as recorded in a statewide birth certificate registry. We included all births between 24+0 and 41+6 weeks' gestational age, excluding multiple gestations, major congenital anomalies, and pregnancies affected by oligohydramnios. Polyhydramnios was identified by International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, codes. χ(2) tests were used to compare the dichotomous outcomes, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were then performed to control for potential confounders. We analyzed the data for pregnancies affected and unaffected by polyhydramnios. The IUFD risk was expressed as a rate per 10,000. RESULTS: The risk of IUFD in pregnancies affected by polyhydramnios was greater at every gestational age compared with unaffected pregnancies. The IUFD risk in pregnancies affected by polyhydramnios was more than 7 times higher than unaffected pregnancies at 37 weeks at a rate of 18.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.0-32.6) vs 2.4 (95% CI, 2.0-2.5) and was 11-fold higher by 40 weeks' gestational age at a rate of 66.3 (95% CI, 10.8-68.6) vs 6.0 (95% CI, 5.1-6.3) in unaffected pregnancies. When adjusted for multiple confounding variables, the presence of polyhydramnios remained associated with an increased odds of IUFD in nonanomalous singleton pregnancies, with an adjusted odds ratio of 5.5 (95% CI, 4.1-7.6). CONCLUSION: Ongoing risk of IUFD is greater in low-risk pregnancies affected by polyhydramnios at all gestational ages compared with unaffected pregnancies with the greatest increase in risk at term. Although further study is needed to explore the underlying etiology of polyhydramnios in these cases, the identification of polyhydramnios alone may warrant increased antenatal surveillance.